The Chicago Bears offensive line got off to a rough start this season with ugly showings against Tennessee, Houston, and Indianapolis. They seem to have steadied themselves over the past two weeks against the Rams and Panthers. Even so, the coaching staff continues searching for the right combination that gives them the best chance to win. The first big decision in those efforts was benching Nate Davis. The former free agent finally wore out his welcome after a string of injuries and inconsistent performances.
Next is to determine who the interior three should be moving forward. As things stand, they’ve been running with Teven Jenkins, Coleman Shelton, and Matt Pryor. This could be what they stick with, but Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune isn’t entirely sold on this. He believes two names could shake things up over the next couple of weeks. One is Ryan Bates, due back from Injured Reserve after the bye week. The other is Bill Murray, who had a strong performance against Carolina, stepping in for the injured Jenkins.
There is a real possibility the Bears consider plugging both into the lineup.
There are other moving parts that will affect what the team does. That starts with left guard Teven Jenkins, who left the win over the Panthers with an ankle injury and was dealing with a bruised rib entering the game. Bill Murray, who leapfrogged Davis as the first option off the bench, played pretty well in Jenkins’ place.
Do the coaches have enough faith in Murray to keep him in the lineup when everyone is healthy? If so, perhaps Murray supplants Matt Pryor, who has been starting at right guard, and then the team can make a call at center between Bates and Shelton…
…If Murray gets more opportunities this week against the Jaguars — I wouldn’t rule it out — perhaps he’s in the conversation if the coaches become more comfortable with his performance. It would be a wonderful problem to have if the Bears get healthy and feel like they have multiple quality options. Imagine that.
The Chicago Bears offensive line remains an unfinished project.
Coaches know they have the tackle positions solidified. They also know a string of really good defenses loom in their near future. If they’re going to get past Green Bay, Detroit, Minnesota, and San Francisco, they need to find a combination that can keep Caleb Williams protected. Jenkins has played better over the past couple of weeks. If his ankle injury isn’t bad (he practiced in a limited fashion on Wednesday), he should keep his job. Bates’ best shot to enter the lineup is at center where he was always supposed to compete with Shelton.
The lingering question is about the right guard. Pryor has handled the job well, but he has athletic limitations. Murray is less experienced but a better athlete, and he has shown that he has improved his fundamentals since switching to guard a couple of years ago. Much will depend on what the Chicago Bears offensive line does against Jacksonville on Sunday. The Jaguars defensive line has looked bad all season. If they give the current lineup problems, coaches may use the bye week to shake things up.
Subscribe to the BFR Youtube channel and ride shotgun with Dave and Ficky as they break down Bears football like nobody else.
I have followed the Bears religiously since age 5: lots of ups and downs, and many strange and mysterious things over the decades. The matter of a flawed OL in this ultra-modern era–to get just five solid guys to work as a solid unit–for this many years when an OL-expert GM has been in charge has bordered on the Twilight Zone. Something is seriously wrong here.
@BearDownTX I was just just reminiscing on how Lamebert was fawning over Davis saying “he’s a pro’s pro. Been in the league for 5 years. He’s going to teach the guys on the line how to eat better, and how to take care of their bodies, etc., etc…” We all know how Davis takes care of his body, he skips camp and practice. lol
“Coaches know they have the tackle positions solidified”.
Do they really? Braxton Jones is a hard-working guy and a keeper but as a swing tackle if he wants that job. The odds of a small school 5th rd pick becoming a long-term LT weren’t great but he has surprised. That said, using an early pick in ‘25 on that position should be on the table if the talent warrants it.
The move from RG to LG is not as hard as the move from RT to LT. IT shouldn’t be causing this many problems for Jenkins. I think it is that he is more of a head case than is let on. I remember something in his rookie year being despondant etc, so lack of confidence is a major thing for him. He is constantly banged up and injured as well. Not many linemen can overcome neck and back issues and thrive in the NFL, they become more and more brittle as time goes on. The Bears, of all teams,… Read more »
Yet they moved Teven from RG to LG because of Nate Davis. I remember Lamebert applauding this move. It’s unfortunate because Teven played extremely well at RG from what I can remember, and that was prior to drafting Darnell Wright. But I digress.